What’s at stake for COP27 climate talks in Egypt? | Explainer News

Developing countries experiencing the worst effects of climate change will aim to acquire financial help from wealthy nations answerable for the most important share of emissions.

After a 12 months of devastating natural disasters, the twenty seventh Conference of the Parties (COP27) on climate change will seek to live as much as its strapline – Together for Implementation – and advance prior commitments to limit global warming.

“The work ahead is immense. As immense because the climate impacts we’re seeing world wide,” United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said at a pre-COP meeting earlier this month.

“A 3rd of Pakistan flooded. Europe’s hottest summer in 500 years. The Philippines hammered. The entire of Cuba in blackout,” he listed, urging swift motion.

This 12 months’s two-week summit, which kicks off on November 6 in Egypt, will aim to strengthen and implement the pledges made finally 12 months’s summit in Scotland, with the goal of keeping global temperature rise below 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 Fahrenheit) to stave off essentially the most devastating effects of a warming planet.

Here’s what it is advisable know concerning the upcoming talks:

What’s COP27?

  • The Conference of the Parties (COP) is the supreme decision-making forum of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), a world environmental treaty signed by 198 countries and which got here into force in 1994 to combat “dangerous human interference with the climate system”.
  • The conference has taken place since 1995, bringing signatory governments together every year to debate and agree the right way to jointly address climate change and its effects.
  • Egypt is hosting this 12 months’s summit within the Red Sea resort town of Sharm El-Sheikh. That is the primary COP in Africa since COP22 was held in Morocco in 2016.
  • Greater than 100 leaders are expected to participate within the World Leaders Summit on November 7-8 and inject political momentum into the talks.
  • Many fossil fuel lobbyists will take part an try and protect their industry from motion to maintain coal, oil and gas in the bottom.
  • Climate activist Greta Thunberg said she is going to not attend, calling the conference a possibility for “greenwashing, lying and cheating”.

What’s its aim?

  • The overarching objective is to halve global greenhouse emissions by 2030 and reach “net zero” by 2050 to maintain warming below 1.5°C as really helpful by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
  • COP26 in Scotland’s port city of Glasgow saw a flurry of pledges that ultimately still left the world on course to hit 2.4°C (4.3°F), in keeping with the Climate Motion Tracker.
  • Government officials this 12 months will tackle a number of the weightiest issues currently keeping the world on course to disastrous heating.
  • Developing countries experiencing the worst effects of climate change will aim to acquire financial help from industrialised nations answerable for the most important share of emissions, which have yet to deliver on guarantees of normal finance for each adaptation and mitigation efforts.

What’s on the agenda at COP27?


  • Expectations at COP27 are high for countries to deliver clear signals of progress on cutting greenhouse gasses, known as mitigation implementation.
  • Parties are set to adopt a “mitigation work programme” to urgently scale up mitigation ambition and implementation before 2030.
  • As last 12 months’s pledges on issues including phasing out coal power and curbing deforestation left the world on course to hit 2.4C of warming, the formal consequence of COP26 – the Glasgow Climate Pact – requested the strengthening of the targets on mitigating greenhouse gas emissions, generally known as Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs).
  • Countries whose NDCs weren’t according to the 1.5°C goal were expected to present a revised version at COP27. Only 26 of 193 countries that agreed to step up their commitments have up to now followed through with more ambitious plans.


  • The Glasgow Climate Pact urged developed countries to a minimum of double adaptation financing by 2025 and launch a two-year work programme on the worldwide goal on adaptation (GGA).
  • Yet, developing countries are usually not getting the promised assistance, including an annual $100bn meant to be delivered from 2020 to 2025.
  • Wealthy countries can be urged to spend rather more money in helping countries adapt and follow through on unfulfilled guarantees.

Loss and damage:

  • “Loss and damage” – also dubbed “climate reparations” – are prone to be a major focus this 12 months.
  • A key request of developing countries has been the creation of a mechanism that gives funding for managing loss and damage brought on by extreme weather.
  • Developed nations have been resisting the problem, which has never been a part of the UN talks’ formal agenda, fearing it’d trigger litigation and compensation claims on a significant scale.
  • The Alliance of Small Island States (AOSIS) will present a proposal for a “response fund” to assist climate victims get well from the loss and damage brought on by climate shocks.
  • This contentious issue could catch more heat during COP27, at a time when aid-providing nations are facing soaring energy prices and diverting their budgets towards the humanitarian crisis in Ukraine.
  • The operationalisation, funding and governance of the Santiago Network on Loss and Damage – established at COP25 to attach vulnerable developing countries with providers of technical assistance, knowledge and resources – may even be a priority.

Energy transition:

  • The Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero (GFANZ) established at COP26 aimed to speed up the transition to a net zero economy by bringing greater than 450 private players within the finance sector to regulate their business models. At COP27, GFANZ is anticipated to propose concrete plans for reducing carbon emissions.
  • Countries agreed last 12 months for the primary time to “phase down” coal production, but some have backslid on their guarantees amid concerns about possible shortages brought on by a cut in energy supplies from Russia.
  • African leaders are prone to call for a proper recognition that they ought to be allowed to develop their fossil fuel reserves.
  • There may be a risk the COP stage could be used to set out misguided visions of a fossil fuel pathway out of the energy crisis.
  • It could prove difficult to succeed in an agreement to scale back gas production, despite the fact that that’s required to satisfy climate goals.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here