EU and US welcome Canada's decision to return Russian turbine to Germany

Because the energy crisis worsens all over the world, the European Union and america have welcomed Canada’s controversial decision to ship back to Germany a turbine that Russia says is vital to resuming gas flows through the Nord Stream 1 pipeline.

Nord Stream 1 is a large underwater pipeline with the capability to move as much as 55 billion cubic metres of gas per 12 months. Its direct connection between Russia and Germany, the EU’s industrial powerhouse, makes it a centrepiece within the continent’s energy mix.

The conduit is currently undergoing a planned 10-day maintenance, an operation that many fear the Kremlin will exploit to indefinitely cut off gas supplies to Europe and wreak economic havoc.

Greater than 10 EU countries have already suffered total or partial suspensions of Russian gas flows.

Russia had initially sent the turbine to Siemens Canada, in Montreal, for a scheduled overhaul. But after the Canadian government imposed sanctions on Gazprom, the state-controlled energy giant that acts because the pipeline’s majority owner, the equipment was blocked from being shipped back to Germany.

Last month, Gazprom announced Nord Stream 1 would run at just 40% of its capability and put the blame on Canada for delaying the turbine’s return.

Berlin blasted Moscow for the sudden reduction and said it was a part of a deliberate campaign to distort the market and pump extra money into the Kremlin’s coffers.

Flows further plummeted in July as Gazprom began the planned maintenance across the pipeline.

“It’s difficult to say whether Nord Stream 1 will run after ten days of maintenance. The past has often shown that technical reasons are sometimes excuses for political decisions. In fact, this might occur again,” said Robert Habeck, Germany’s vice-chancellor.

“No one can see inside Putin’s head, so we have no idea what’s going to occur.”

So as to prevent the crisis from spiralling uncontrolled, Canada decided to grant a “time-limited and revocable permit” to send the repaired turbine back to Germany.

“Absent a essential supply of natural gas, the German economy will suffer very significant hardship and Germans themselves will probably be prone to being unable to heat their homes as winter approaches,” said Jonathan Wilkinson, Canada’s minister of natural resources.

Wilkinson stressed the federal government was firmly committed to supporting Ukraine to withstand the invasion launched by President Vladimir Putin.

‘Putin’s blackmail of Europe’

Ottawa’s decision triggered immediate backlash from Kyiv.

Ukraine’s ministry of foreign affairs summoned Canada’s ambassador to the country over what President  Volodymyr Zelenskyy called an “absolutely unacceptable” case of sanctions relief in Russia’s favour.

“This is just not just in regards to the turbine for the Nord Stream gas pipeline, which Canada was not purported to, but nevertheless decided to transfer actually to Russia. That is about general rules [of sanctions],” Zelenskyy said in one in every of his day by day speeches.

“If a terrorist state can squeeze out such an exception to sanctions, what exceptions will it want tomorrow or the day after tomorrow? This query may be very dangerous. Furthermore, it’s dangerous not just for Ukraine but additionally for all countries of the democratic world.”

Zelenskyy warned the Canadian concession can be perceived as a show of “weakness” by Moscow, who wouldn’t play by the principles of the energy market “unless it sees strength.”

A gaggle of lawmakers from Canada’s conservative party, who’re in opposition, also criticised the choice taken by the federal government of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.

“Allowing the return of the gas turbine sets a dangerous precedent of folding to Putin’s blackmail of Europe, and can negatively impact Canada’s standing on the world stage,” they wrote in a press release.

The Ukrainian World Congress, an advocacy group that represents the Ukrainian community in Canada, lambasted the tailored lifting of sanctions and said it will launch a legal case to stop the federal government’s plans.

The outrage increased after The Globe and Mail, Canada’s leading newspaper, revealed the so-called “time-limited” permit would cover as much as two years and the re-export of six turbines, the primary of which is on the very centre of the political storm.

Under the arrangement, Siemens Canada will avoid any contact with Gazprom. As an alternative, it’s going to send the turbine back to Germany after which German authorities will hand it over to Russia.

‘One in every of the justifications has been removed’

While Ukraine expressed outrage over Canada’s decision, Berlin, Brussels and Washington openly welcomed the move, arguing the turbine’s return would deprive the Kremlin of a pretext to interrupt gas supplies.

“With the return of this part, one in every of the justifications getting used by Russia for reduced gas flows has been removed,” the European Commission said on Tuesday.

The Commission is working on an emergency plan to coordinate national measures within the event the Kremlin turns off the taps for good. Brussels desires to avoid the chaotic response that characterised the primary months of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Washington said it was “grateful” for the Canada-Germany partnership.

“Within the short term, the turbine will allow Germany and other European countries to replenish their gas reserves, increasing their energy security and resiliency and countering Russia’s efforts to weaponize energy,” said Ned Price, spokesperson of the US Department of State.

Price noted the US was already working with its European allies to further slash dependency on Russian fossil fuels and cripple the Kremlin’s ability to wage war.

“At the identical time, we’re taking lively steps to limit the impact of President Putin’s war on global energy markets and protect our economies,” he added.

Each side of the Atlantic are currently struggling to contain the ripple effects of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, particularly the disruption of energy markets, which has resulted in record-breaking inflation and soaring bills for consumers and firms.

The positive statements released within the aftermath of Ottawa’s decision reflect the renewed geopolitical dimension that fossil fuels have acquired since 24 February.

For US President Joe Biden, taming gasoline and diesel prices has turn out to be a priority of maximum urgency ahead of crucial midterm elections through which his party is predicted to suffer heavy losses.

For Europe, energy security has was an existential danger. The specter of a complete cut-off of Russian energy would almost actually trigger a deep recession across the continent, forcing some governments to ration gas and shut down hand-picked factories.

Although the Commission has thus far avoided making any clear-cut projections about an imminent recession, investors are already assuming the likelihood as real: the euro has reached parity with the dollar for the primary in 20 years. Analysts don’t rule out an extra decline in the worth of the common currency.

Within the meantime, Europeans hold their collective breath as Gazprom carries out its maintenance of Nord Stream 1, wondering if gas supplies will restart or vanish.

The multinational said on Wednesday it didn’t possess any documents that may guarantee the return of the turbine from Canada to the Portovaya compressor station (CS), which is situated within the Russian coast of the Baltic Sea. It then forged doubt over the restart of gas flows through the pipeline.

“In these circumstances, it appears not possible to achieve an objective conclusion on further developments regarding the secure operation of the Portovaya CS, a facility of critical importance to the Nord Stream gas pipeline,” Gazprom said in a brief statement published on its Twitter account.

This piece has been updated to incorporate recent developments.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here