Windfall Elimination Provision Getting Attention in Congress

Image: zimmytws/

For the umpteenth time, efforts are underway within the Congress to repeal the Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP) and the Government Pension Offset (GPO). Each laws have long been a thorn within the side of employees covered by the Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS). That’s because they negatively affect the Social Security advantages of anyone who worked in a job where Social Security deductions weren’t taken from their pay. This week I’ll concentrate on the WEP, next week on the GPO.

Under the WEP, anyone reaching age 62 after 1985 and is eligible for Social Security and in addition for an annuity based in whole or part on work where they didn’t pay Social Security taxes—corresponding to CSRS—can have a lower computational formula used to calculate their Social Security profit.

To learn the way this provision of law may affect you, have a look at your personal work history. First, have you ever earned enough credits under Social Security to qualify for a profit? You need to have earned 40 credits (that’s, 40 calendar quarters).

Second, was the amount of cash you earned to get those credits “substantial”? The law’s requirement that those earnings be substantial created a better hurdle than that required for eligibility. That quantity increases every year; in 2022 you’ll have needed to earn at the very least $27,300 to have it considered to be substantial earnings.

So, how much money could you lose due to WEP? For comparison, let’s start with the fundamental formula that applies to everyone who has been covered by Social Security all along, corresponding to FERS employees. In the event that they retired and turned 65 in 2022, the primary $1,024 of their average monthly earnings could be multiplied by 90 percent, the following earnings as much as $6,172 by 32 percent, and all earnings above that by 15 percent. As you possibly can see, the formula is weighted in favor of lower income employees.

The WEP adds a modifier to that formula for those also eligible for an annuity not including Social Security (again, corresponding to CSRS): only those with 30 or more years of considerable earnings can have the primary $1,024 of average earnings multiplied by 90 percent. For every year fewer than 30 years of considerable earnings, the multiplier might be reduced by 5 percentage points per 12 months, right down to 20 years of such coverage. For instance, the multiplier for 25 years is 65 percent. For 20 or fewer it’s 40 percent.

In dollar terms, the utmost reduction works out to be just above $500 a month.

It is usually argued that the WEP ought to be eliminated since it was some type of accident or unintended consequence of a not well thought out change in law throughout the Social Security reforms of the Nineteen Eighties. Actually, it was a deliberate selection. Here’s how the SSA explains it:

Social Security advantages replace a percentage of a employee’s pre-retirement earnings. The formula used to compute Social Security advantages includes aspects that be certain that lower-paid employees get a better percentage return than their more well-to-do counterparts. For instance, lower-paid employees could conceivably get a Social Security profit that equals as much as 90 percent of their pre-retirement earnings. Highly paid employees receive rates of return which can be considerably less. (The common is about 42 percent.)

Before the law was modified in 1983, employees who hung out in jobs not covered by Social Security had their advantages computed as in the event that they were long-term, low-wage employees. Thus they received the advantage of the upper percentage of Social Security advantages along with their other pension. The modified formula eliminates this windfall.

That’s, Congress acted to remove what it considered to be an unearned profit. Knowing that is not any comfort to those of you feeling its effect, or who will after retiring in the long run. But that’s the law unless and until it is modified.

Calculator: See your time to retire under FERS ticking away

Report Assesses Impact of Repealing Windfall, Offset Provisions

Enrollee Share of FEHB Premiums to Rise 8.7 Percent on Average for 2023

Life Insurance: FEGLI Coverage for Federal Retirees

TSP Responds to Complaints about Recent System

OPM Addresses Drivers of Premium Hikes, Upcoming Coverage Changes in FEHB

With FERS Annuity Indexed for Inflation, Fed Retirees Faring Higher

Creating and Keeping a Ready Money Reserve for Retirement

Looking Forward to a Lump-sum Payment for Unused Annual Leave

Eligibility for FERS Retirement

askFW: Calculating a Federal Annuity – FERS and CSRS

askFW: Federal Annuity Calculation for LEOs and Firefighters

FERS Retirement Planning Bundle: 2022 FERS Guide & TSP Handbook


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here